One of the initial assumptions I had when beginning my film
viewing is that the independent film was a venue that existed only with
American cinema. However, this absurd
notion was quickly shattered with the discovery of world cinema that also finds
an attachment to low budget arthouse filmmaking that is equally concerned with
its cinematic substance as it is with its social commentary. Furthermore, as I delve deeper into the
crevices of individual countries cinema I am surprised to find stellar indie
films right below the surface, as is certainly the case with Ki-duk Kim’s
3-Iron. Like so many indie films, the
plot borders on impossibility and is exceptionally quirky, yet it what is
becoming nearly assumed Korean theme, darkness, violence and revenge all exist
in the narrative as well. 3-Iron still
seems to have a bit more than it’s competitors and I will use a phrase I have
used in the past when describing various indie films on my blog and say that
the film has a heartbeat, in that it touches deeply onto something integral to
human existence and does so in a matter of 80 some odd minutes. It is an earnest and rewarding film to those
who watch it, and a deeply ponderous film on the nature of human interactions.
The narrative in absurdist fashion follows the life of a
young rebellious male who spends his days and nights breaking into and
borrowing from houses that are briefly unoccupied by their residents who are
away on vacations or business trips. He
discovers his places by cleverly placing food advertisements on the individual
house doors, stopping at the places hours later choosing those locations that
have yet to remove the advertisement.
While staying in these places he often eats the food available and takes
pictures of himself in front of the various photos within the house. In each house the young man is also careful
to wash the clothing for the absent persons and always alters at least one
items within the house, whether it be a clock or scale. He seems set to engage in his behavior for
years to come, until he is discovered by a wife who spends her days lackadaisically
wandering around her house. Initially
alarmed by the intruder, the wife says nothing and simply observes the man
steadily growing fond of his actions and methodologies. Eventually she becomes enamored with him and
engages with him, until her husband returns home enraged. Realizing the tragedy of her situation, the
young man attacks the husband and takes the wife with him to move from house to
house. The husband begins tracking the
couple down and eventually finds them after the two call about a dead body
discovered in one house. The young man
is jailed and the wife is forced to return to husband who now makes it is goal
to be “better” for her, although he clearly has no desire to do so
forever. Meanwhile, the young man
practices escaping from the prison and is eventually successful after learning
to move and exist as a ghost. He returns
to the couples house and exists in the shadow of the husband, becoming a lover
to the wife right under the husbands gaze.
It should also be noted that this film exists with little dialogue between
the husband and wife and absolutely no dialogue whatsoever between the young
man and the wife, it is truly a feat.
What then can be made of such a sparse, yet critically dense
film. There is certainly the possibility
that the entire narrative is related to issues of guilt and the ghosts that
exist in such a state of mind. Perhaps
the young man only represents the lingering problems of the past as he passes
between each household, in some instances causing a child to act violently
towards his mother or in others for an artist to become exceptionally
paranoid. However, this reading is a bit
to vague and really not likely. It is
also possible that it is simply intended to display the various states of
living within Korea as it struggles through the 21st century,
whether it be those in abject poverty, or those with considerable wealth and
privacy. The film does do this with
great efficiency, as it displays a diverse population that is both old and
young, however, it is unlikely that it should be read as the sole commentary
within the film. Instead, I would suggest
that this film is very much about the crumbling of a marriage between a
misogynist and powerful husband and his submissive yet depressed wife. Her inability to speak is simply a reflection
of her lack of power and her husbands irate nature and continual threats are
his actions to reassert his masculinity.
It is not until the wife is allowed an opportunity to extract herself
from her situation that she seems to become more enlivened, considering that
she essentially discovers a new reason to exist. More interesting, however, is that that wife
continues to remain silent in her new endeavors, not because she is unallowed
to speak, but because she has found a partnership with a person who is also
lacking a voice, but manages to express himself in the world regardless. The wife is clearly inspired by this and
engages in a world where she has a voice and a form of expression, most evident
when she rearranges and rethinks a picture of herself that is hanging in one
visited apartment. Not only does she
control the expression, she also controls how her body is being used and
depicted in a very literal manner. Finally,
she comes to create a bond with another individual so great that it can go
unspoken and she returns to her husband empowered and separated from his
violent hand. She has reached a freedom
and enlightenment within the film that to some degree reflects her escape from
a troubled marriage. While we are left
to ponder the future of those involved, it is clear that the past of problems,
are likely to stay far in fading horizon.
3-Iron is an exceptionally good film and well worth
watching. However, owning a copy is only
necessary for the diehard Korean cinema fans.
No comments:
Post a Comment