I will begin this blog post with a question: Is it possible
for a western genre film to be totally 80's? If you answered no, then you
have clearly never seen the film Young Guns, which manages to be both a sturdy
western and an example of everything we have come to both love and loathe about
80's filmmaking. Rife with a group of the hottest actors of the late
80's, Young Guns has everything one would desire from the particular era of
filmmaking, yet it manages to have solid shootouts and a considerable grasp of
western elements as had been well established decades earlier.
Furthermore, despite having a set of actors who have by no means become
synonymous with respected acting, the film is quite enjoyable and surprisingly
engaging. Young Guns, as a film, deserves recognition as one of the
better offering from the back half of the decade and is certainly one of the
standout Westerns made within the past twenty years. The film is not
particularly stellar in any of its execution; however, it is notably consistent
and is a solid movie. One will be hard pressed to find anything within
the film that remotely justifies it as being cinematic, yet it is easy to find
moments of enjoyability throughout the film, whether they come from Keifer
Sutherland waxing poetic or Emilio Estevez attempting to out bad ass Charlie
Sheen. Essentially, Young Guns is nothing more than a regular teen drama set
with the Wild West as its backdrop, yet something about its composition manages
to be engaging enough to keep the viewer around even if it is a terribly
predictable film.
Young Guns, follows a group of gunslingers who have barely
passed the threshold of puberty attempting to make their name in the ruthless
world of the newly emerging west. Their
sole form of guidance comes in the form of a suave mentor and employer named
John Tunstall (Terence Stamp) who in exchange for protection teaches the young
men how to read and write. These young
men are a group of unique individuals that clearly trust each other, yet manage
to pave distinct paths that would quickly mean loosing interest in one another’s
desires. The group of boys includes
Charley Bowdre (Casey Siemasko) and Dirty Steve Stephens (Dermot Mulroney) the
clear lackeys in the gang who rarely speak and simply follow the orders of the
higher members of the gang. Jose Chavez
(Lou Diamond Phillips) a knife wielding Mexican who has ties to Navajo
ancestry. Josiah “Doc” Scurlock (Keifer
Sutherland) the intellectual of the group who finds himself preoccupied with
taking the hand of a Chinese immigrant.
Dick Brewer (Charlie Sheen) the clear leader of the back who adheres to
the idea of letting his actions speak louder than his words, and finally
William “The Kid” Bonney (Emilio Estevez) the newcomer to the group whose
rebellious spirit and clearly high levels of angst continually place the group,
know as The Regulators, in danger. It is
not long into their existence that the group is forced to test their limits as
a ruthless politician named Lawrence G. Murphy (Jack Palance) starts trouble
with John Tunstall upon the realization that he has his own political
ambitions. To assure his failed
candidacy, Murphy has Tunstall killed, which leads the group into a vengeful
fit that leaves many of Murphy’s men dead in the hill and streets of the Wild
West. Ultimately, with the aid of
Tunstall’s friend Alex McSween (Terry O’Quinn) the group is able to hole-up in
a house and fend off Murphy’s attacks upon the group, who have at this point in
the film become criminals. This comes,
however, with a large amount of loss, most notably Dick Brewer, who dies much
earlier because of a bounty placed on his head, when he is mistaken as The
Kid. Ultimately, most of the group is
able to escape into hiding and continue with their life with little hassle, of course,
the narrative notes that “The Kid,” as known in famous Wild West tales is in
fact killed, but as the inevitable sequel suggests, that story is for another
time.
I joked about the film being incredibly 80’s in its existence;
however, the jesting does have an inherent truth to it below the surface. Despite being entrenched within the dialogue
and ways of the west, Young Guns is absolutely a social critique of 1980’s
America, particularly one in which the youth of America had become disillusioned
with their political system. This
particular time in American politics witnessed the problematic era of Reaganomics
and hyper-conservative rule over The United States, only to be followed by the
seeming certainty that an inept and equally conservative president would take
their place. The transfer of power from
one corrupt individual to another seemed illogical yet impossible to end
without force and confrontation.
However, despite the feelings many individuals found themselves too
indifferent to affect a change and simply found themselves content complaining
about the problems without engaging in their discontinuation. Young Guns is certainly an attempt to create
a zealous animosity towards such unchecked powers. The aptly named Regulators are meant to take
down Murphy, a conservative politician with deep-rooted political ties and
seemingly endless amounts of money, while young Americans were believed
responsible for taking down Right Wing oppression, which too had deep pockets
of money and political power. As is the
case with the film, many people suffered from the revolution against such
powers, but as would be the case only a few years later, politics did change,
and while it may not have been for the better overall, it certainly did prove
promising for the future of youth involvement in political change. While it is quite possible that Young Guns is
simply a western film intended for young adults and teenagers, it would be
unfortunate to look over the clear societal influences affecting its
production, as they add a clear element of the era’s political discourse.
Young Guns is certainly a contemporary classic that is to be
seen. However, it is not so brilliant
that owning a copy is necessary, in fact, the current copy available is not the
greatest of quality and suffers from a few dubbing issues. As such, renting the film seems to be the
best choice at the moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment